Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1918No. 9394PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Indictment for misdemeanor; from Clarke superior court— Judge Cobb. November 14, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains only the general grounds. The following is the opinion of Judge Cobb, who presided at the trial, as contained in the record and as delivered and ordered filed in connection with his order overruling the motion for new trial: “These defendants [Andrew Bell and Moses Shaw] were indicted for having the possession of liquor in violation of the law, were tried jointly, and each was convicted, and Andrew Bell’s motion for new trial is now for decision. In passing upon the motion for new trial, that view of the evidence which is most unfavorable to the accused…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Townsend v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Vandeviere v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Parrott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API