Legal Opinion

McCracken v. Swift & Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

This is an action for damages for the maintenance of a temporary nuisance. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff and defendant has appealed.

Defendant has established and maintains a poultry, egg, and butter house in the City of Springfield in which large numbers of all kinds of poultry are kept and prepared for shipment and large numbers of poultry are slaughtered, making necessary the disposition of large quantities of offal, blood, feathers and filth and in which large numbers of eggs are inspected and many unfit for use are handled and disposed of which adds to the filth which must be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Finney v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Smiths' v. McConathySupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  4. Ellis v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. McCardle v. George B. Peck Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Ex Parte Grand Manor, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Shelley v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Fuchs v. Curran Carbonizing and Engineering Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Ruppel v. Ralston Purina CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API