Legal Opinion

Zenquis v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

Now pending before the court in this matter are the motion to dismiss the claims against the City of Philadelphia (“the City”), filed by the City on April 11, 2011 (Docket No. 7), and the City’s motion for leave to file a reply brief to the plaintiffs response to the motion to dismiss, filed on May 18, 2011 (Docket No. 10). For the reasons that follow, I will grant the motion for leave to file a reply brief nunc pro tunc, but I will deny the motion to dismiss.

I. Background

A. Factual Allegations

The following narrative is drawn from the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Godfrey v. Upland BoroughDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Barasky v. DentDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Brazil v. Scranton School BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. GOFF-COHEN v. COHENDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API