Godfrey v. Upland Borough
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint, and Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the motions are granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
Plaintiffs Denise M. Marusco Godfrey and Byron J. Godfrey allege that Defendants Catania Engineering Associates, Inc. (“Catania”), Delaware County Regional Water Control Authority (“DELCORA”), and Upland Borough (“Upland”) conspired to obtain an illegal easement and install water control infrastructure on Plaintiffs’ property, causing severe damage to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MOSS v. SAL LAPIO, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- South River Watershed Alliance, Inc. v. DeKalb County, GeorgiaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020