Legal Opinion

Cousins v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 1, 2017No. 0099/16PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.

On the day before his robbery trial was to begin in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Earl Sylvester Cousins asked to discharge his court-appointed counsel. In accordance with Md. Rule 4-215(e), the court allowed Mr. Cousins to explain the reasons for his request, but found that he did not have good cause to discharge counsel. The court proceeded to inform Mr. Cousins that the trial would proceed as scheduled and that he would have to represent himself if he discharged his counsel. Mr. Cousins said that he would discharge his counsel and represent himself.

When the trial began the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. LinaresNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CoaleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Hargett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Wallace v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API