Menstell v. Johnson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The design of Ladd’s Addition indicates clearly that the dedicator intended it should be a residential area, — in fact, a beautiful subdivision of the City of Portland. In addition to the central park, he provided four others; all five are small, but nevertheless they are so placed and the streets so laid out that the majority of the lots front either on the parks, or have a view of shrubbery in the parks. To this subdivision and to its principal avenue Mr. Ladd gave his name. Having arranged the streets and the parks in a unique and beautiful manner, he put upon each lot a building line and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carter v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1873
- Meier v. Portland Cable Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
- McCloskey v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Steel v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Zinn v. SidlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Wischmeyer v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Parrish v. NewburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Southwest Petroleum Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Swaggerty v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.