Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hayton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1979No. Crim. 18571PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Defendant and appellant William Hayton appeals from a judgment entered after he pleaded guilty. Appellant contends on appeal that (1) the delay in filing the complaint denied him due process of law and the delay in his arrest denied him his right to speedy trial; and (2) he was not brought to trial within the time specified in Penal Code section 1382. We have determined that these issues are not cognizable on appeal after a defendant has pleaded guilty and therefore the appeal is dismissed.

On November 21, 1977, a complaint was filed in the Municipal Court of the County of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. KaaneheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. LaudermilkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. People v. PadfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. People v. CellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. ShultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. EgbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API