Legal Opinion

MacHnofsky v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1931No. Appeal 33PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenner, J.,

The plaintiff, Machnofsky, filed this bill in equity asking the court to cancel and set aside a deed purporting to have been executed and acknowledged by him conveying certain premises in Throop Borough to his wife — now deceased — , and to declare the same null and void as a forgery.

The defendants are the children of the deceased grantee, some by the plaintiff, and the others by a former husband. The deed, itself, could not be found or produced, but the record in the recorder’s office showed that such a deed had been signed by him by mark, acknowledged, and delivered to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Stehle v. Jaeger Automatic Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. McMillen v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Post v. AverySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  5. Steel v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Transit Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Ruttenburg, Exr. v. Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Coxe v. KriebelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Gordon v. RobinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Gilham v. GilhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API