Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Robinson

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1952No. Civ. A. 175PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

This is a trespass action based on an automobile accident. A jury trial was held, over which my late associate, the Honorable Owen M. Burns, presided, which resulted in a verdict in favor of defendant.

On the basis of Rule 63 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., I am satisfied the record speaks with sufficient clarity and completeness for me to dispose of the matters which remain for adjudication, and that no need exists to hear the case de novo.

The instant motion is for a new trial, based upon alleged errors of the trial judge in the admission of certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. Cridge's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. McKee v. Jamestown Baking Co., Inc. (Burns, Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Alexander v. QueenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Cafritz v. KoslowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Yates v. Bair Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. Gordon v. Robinson (Gordon, Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. Heidebrink v. MoriwakiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API