Legal Opinion

Smith v. Harris

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 15, 2022No. 1:18-cv-02836Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IKIEM SMITH, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil Action No. GLR-18-2836 SEAN HARRIS, et al., * Defendants. * *** MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants Corporal Michael Cox, Sergeant Sean Harris, Former Trooper First Class (“TFC”) Justin Hohner, TFC Ryan Boyce, and TFC James Pettit’s (collectively, “Police Defendants”) Motion to Compel, or in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 78). The Motion is ripe for disposition, and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md. 2021). For the reasons set…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Pillsbury Co. v. ConboySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Carl D. Wehling and Geraldine D. Wehling v. Columbia Broadcasting SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API