Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Martin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1995No. CV-94-0067-PRPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORCORAN, Justice.

Petitioner Raymond Espinoza, a criminal defendant in Maricopa County, challenges the policy adopted by a group of Maricopa County Superior Court judges of summarily rejecting all plea agreements containing stipulated sentences. The court of appeals affirmed the policy. We granted review, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and rule 31.19, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The criminal divisions of the Maricopa County Superior Court are divided into four groups designated as quadrants A through D. Quadrant B,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. LambrightArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hedlund v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. De NistorArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. YslasArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. State v. DarelliCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. Galati Ex Rel. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Zarabia v. BradshawArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. RubioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API