Legal Opinion

State v. Darelli

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 31, 2003No. 1 CA-CR 02-0432PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 We hold in this case that a trial judge may not effectively implement a plea cut-off date, by rejecting all potential pleas except a plea to the charges, based solely on the procedural posture of the ease at issue.

Factual and Procedural History

¶2 On October 25, 2001, appellant was charged with two counts of aggravated assault (Counts 1 and 2) and one count of disorderly conduct with a deadly weapon (Count 3). These charges arose out of a domestic dispute on June 14, 2001 in which appellant struck the victim, Richard C., multiple times in the face. He also threatened…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Woods v. BlockArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. GroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. DEANDRE BROOKS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RubioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API