Heikes v. New York Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This is an action upon a $2,500 policy of life insurance containing a double indemnity clause. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. The policy was issued by the defendant (appellee) to Lambert C. Heikes on January 2, 1941. The insured at that time was a senior student at the University of Minnesota. The policy was a Minnesota contract On the first page or face of the policy, in bold type, in conformity with § 61.25, Minn.St.Ann., appears the following language:
“If the Insured shall die before the Maturity Date, the Company agrees upon receipt of due proof,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lumber Underwriters of NY v. RifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Russell v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buder v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Nolley v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Hendon v. Bankers Life Co. of Des MoinesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950