Legal Opinion
State v. Yanez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 3, 1976No. 2567PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of possession of morphine contrary to § 54-11-23(A), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp.1975) defendant appeals. The appeal was assigned to the legal calendar on the basis of the facts set forth in the docketing statement. Only two of the issues stated in the docketing statement are argued. See Novak v. Dow, 82 N.M. 30, 474 P.2d 712 (Ct.App.1970). The two issues presented for decision involve: (1) judicial notice, and (2) possession versus use.
The following facts are those set forth in the docketing statement. Agent Moore observed what he suspected was a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Novak v. DowNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Peachie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. BeeversNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. BrennanMontana Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. FlinchpaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. McCoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. VormIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.