Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Green

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 11, 1989No. 89-P-233PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The primary issues in the defendant’s appeal from his conviction for operating under the influence of narcotic drugs (G. L. c. 90, § 24) relate to the proof needed to show that codeine is a narcotic as defined in G. L. c. 94C, § 1. General Laws c. 90, § 24(1)(a)(1), as appearing in St. 1982, c. 373, § 2 (“driving under” statute), defines the offense as operating a motor vehicle “while under the influence of . . . narcotic drugs ... as defined in section one of chapter ninety-four C . . . .”

1. Codeine as a narcotic. Since the defendant claims that his motion for a required finding of not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. United States v. Charles Eldon Gould, United States of America v. Joseph Patrick CareyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. HoseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. The People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. BarnetteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. FineganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API