Legal Opinion
County of Alameda v. State Board of Control
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 1, 1993No. A055071PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, J.
The State Board of Control and several of its members (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Board) appeal from a judgment compelling the Board to deem the cost of medical services provided to indigent crime victims at Highland General Hospital in the County of Alameda, a “pecuniary loss” as defined by Government Code section 13960, subdivision (d).
We will hold that neither the County of Alameda nor Don Perata, as a member of the board of supervisors and a county taxpayer, has standing to assert the claims of medically indigent crime victims for compensation from the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. HoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- City of Industry v. City of FillmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Adams v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re Corrine W.California Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.