Legal Opinion

Doe v. Crooks

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 23, 2005No. 25987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

In this sexual-abuse action, the circuit court granted summary judgment for Respondent Richard H. Crooks, M.D. (Crooks), holding that the action of Appellant John Doe (Doe) was barred under the statute of limitations. We certified the case pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm.

FACTS

This action was commenced in 2002, when Doe was thirty-four years old. He asserts that in 1983, when he was fourteen or fifteen years old, Crooks molested him.

Doe acknowledges that he was aware of the alleged abuse while it was occurring; that he knew at the time that it was wrong; that he immediately began to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Doe v. RD AND EDSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Jenkins v. MearesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. United States Rubber Co. v. McManusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Goff v. MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Doe v. HoweCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Robert E. Dupuis v. Roman Catholic Bishop of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  3. Archbishop of Washington v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  4. Bd. of Education Of Harford Cnty. v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  5. Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API