Doe v. Howe
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GOOLSBY, J.:
This appeal involves claims by the appellant John Doe against the respondents Gedney M. Howe, III, and Gedney M. Howe, III, P.A., for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. The trial court granted summary judgment to Howe and his law firm. Doe appeals. We affirm the grant of summary judgment on Doe’s action for legal malpractice, vacate the dismissal of Doe’s action for breach of fiduciary duty, and remand the breach of fiduciary duty claim for a written order pursuant to our opinion in Bowen v. Lee Process Systems Co. 1
FACTS
We set forth the facts below, as we must,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Colucci v. Rosen, Goldberg, Slavet, Levenson & Wekstein, P.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Majumdar v. LurieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Manning v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stokes-Craven Holding Corp. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Davis v. Parkview ApartmentsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Larry Southern v. Richard H. Bishoff, PCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Brailsford v. BrailsfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Umphreyville v. GittinsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.