Gallegos v. Glaser Crandell Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
I agree with Justice T. G. Kavanagh that the provisions of § 115(d) of 1969 PA 317 (MCLA 418.115[d]; MSA 17.237[115][d]), violate plaintiffs’ rights to equal protection provided for in the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Michigan.. However, I arrive at this conclusion by a somewhat different route. Certain factual stipulations were entered into at the workmen’s compensation hearing before Referee Johnson on February 16, 1970. They constitute the facts for consideration and determination of the questions involved in this case.
It was stipulated that injuries to plaintiffs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wright v. Council of EmporiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McKendrick v. PetrucciMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Otto v. HahnNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Stanton v. Lloyd Hammond Produce FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Goodson v. LW Hult Produce CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Benson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.