Eastman v. Eastman
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by husband, pro se, from a divorce judgment.
The hearing was ore tenus. Husband was not present nor was he represented by counsel. He was in prison at the time of the hearing and had filed a motion with the trial court to have himself brought from prison so as to be present at the hearing. His motion was denied. He filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. The writ was denied on the basis of Whitehead v.Bi-Petro Marketing, Inc., 356 So.2d 150 (Ala. 1978). That case points out that a prisoner is not entitled in a civil case to have himself brought from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Borsdorf v. MillsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Whitehead v. BI-PETRO MARKETING, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Panayiotou v. PanayiotouCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Pignolet v. State Dept. of Pensions & SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- In re Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for ColburnOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- S.J. v. Limestone County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Ala. River Grp., Inc. v. Conecuh Timber, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.