Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Eastman

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 2, 1983No. Civ. 3495PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by husband, pro se, from a divorce judgment.

The hearing was ore tenus. Husband was not present nor was he represented by counsel. He was in prison at the time of the hearing and had filed a motion with the trial court to have himself brought from prison so as to be present at the hearing. His motion was denied. He filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. The writ was denied on the basis of Whitehead v.Bi-Petro Marketing, Inc., 356 So.2d 150 (Ala. 1978). That case points out that a prisoner is not entitled in a civil case to have himself brought from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borsdorf v. MillsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Whitehead v. BI-PETRO MARKETING, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Panayiotou v. PanayiotouCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pignolet v. State Dept. of Pensions & SEC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. In re Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for ColburnOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. S.J. v. Limestone County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Ala. River Grp., Inc. v. Conecuh Timber, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API