Legal Opinion

State v. Warden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1988No. 53631PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Defendant appeals after the denial by the court of his “motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.” We affirm.

Defendant was convicted of first-degree murder in the killing of his brother and was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1978. We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal in 1979. State v. Warden, 591 S.W.2d 170 (Mo.App.1979). In 1980 defendant filed a Rule 27.26 motion and was given an eviden-tiary hearing. The grounds alleged in his motion were 1) newly discovered evidence warranting a new trial and 2) ineffective assistance of counsel. Rejecting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. MooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Carver v. WhippleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Clemmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Ferguson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. LawyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. LangstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API