Legal Opinion

State v. Lawyer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2006No. ED 88621PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals pro se from the order denying his Rule 29.05 motion, filed March 14, 2003, to reduce as excessive the sentence that he received on August 6, 1991, for first degree assault and armed criminal action. 1 We affirm.

In a criminal prosecution, the judgment becomes final at the time the trial court pronounces sentence. State ex rel. Wagner v. Ruddy, 582 S.W.2d 692, 694 (Mo. banc 1979). The trial court exhausts its jurisdiction when it enters a judgment and sentence consistent with the law. Id. at 695; State v. Warden, 753 S.W.2d 63, 64 (Mo.App.1988). Here, defendant’s sentence was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. RuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. State v. VanSickelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. WardenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. State v. LawyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BryantMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Scroggins v. KelloggMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Weir v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API