Legal Opinion

Borgstedt v. Borgstedt

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

Plaintiff wife moves to reargue a motion to confirm the report of the official referee and for an interlocutory decree of annulment. This undefended annulment action was referred in the usual course to an official referee who held a hearing and signed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion to confirm the report of the official referee and for a judgment of nullity was denied on the ground that the plaintiff had not established a prenuptial fraud (see 64 N. Y. S. 2d 888).

This action is to annul a marriage on the ground that before the marriage defendant fraudulently promised he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Shonfeld v. ShonfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Rutstein v. RutsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Wells v. TalhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hubner v. HubnerNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Labbate v. LabbateNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Riss v. RissNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Schibi v. SchibiConnecticut Superior Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API