Legal Opinion

Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 17, 1988No. 86-957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

486 U.S. 847 (1988)

LILJEBERG

v.

HEALTH SERVICES ACQUISITION CORP.

No. 86-957.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 9, 1987

Reargued April 25, 1988

Decided June 17, 1988

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

H. Bartow Farr III reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were A. J. Schmitt, Jr., and Melvin W. Mathes.

William M. Lucas, Jr., reargued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Joyce M. Dombourian, Curtis R. Boisfontaine, and Kathryn J. Lichtenberg.[*]

2Opinion of the Court · StevensJustice Stevens

In 1974 Congress amended the Judicial Code "to broaden and clarify the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Rehnquist; Dissent · O'Connor.

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daniel Rodriguez v. Paul CopenhaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. (PC) Giraldes v. NicolaiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. Arellano v. HaskinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Daniel Rodriguez v. Paul CopenhaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Morris v. Scott KernanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API