Daniel Rodriguez v. Paul Copenhaver
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TASHIMA
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Federal prisoner Daniel Rodriguez appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging *1240the Bureau of Prisons’ denial of a discretionary nunc pro tunc designation of a state prison for service of his federal sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b).
We hold that the district court erred by dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had jurisdiction to consider Rodriguez’s claims that the Bureau of Prisons violated the Constitution, exceeded its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Reeb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Close v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- (HC) Arellano-Cigfuego v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (HC) Briones-Pereyra v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (HC) Hand v. SawyerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (HC) Hand v. SawyerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (HC) Iqbal v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.