Legal Opinion

Daniel Rodriguez v. Paul Copenhaver

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 2016No. 14-16399PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TASHIMA

OPINION

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Federal prisoner Daniel Rodriguez appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging *1240the Bureau of Prisons’ denial of a discretionary nunc pro tunc designation of a state prison for service of his federal sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b).

We hold that the district court erred by dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction. The district court had jurisdiction to consider Rodriguez’s claims that the Bureau of Prisons violated the Constitution, exceeded its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Reeb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Close v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. (HC) Arellano-Cigfuego v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  2. (HC) Briones-Pereyra v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (HC) Hand v. SawyerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (HC) Hand v. SawyerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (HC) Iqbal v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API