Legal Opinion
Rubinstein v. Alaska Pacific Consortium (In Re New England Fish Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 5, 1982No. 19-10704PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SIDNEY C. VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The plaintiffs, Ocean Beauty Alaska, Inc., (hereinafter “Ocean Beauty”) and the trustee for the debtor, New England Fish Company (hereinafter “NEFCO”), have moved for summary judgment and for partial summary judgment authorizing sale of property free and clear of certain civil rights or Title VII claims being made against the NEFCO estate.
The essential issue in this case concerns whether Title VII successor liability applies to judicial sales in bankruptcy. The succes-sorship doctrine was formulated by the courts to maintain the viability…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nathanson v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Matter of Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension Fund v. Tasemkin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- In Re Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Volvo White Truck Corp. v. Chambersburg Beverage, Inc. (In Re White Motor Credit Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.