Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1935No. 5341PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EPHRAIM HANSON, Justice.

The widow and minor children of Ira Walter Roberts, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, made application to the Industrial Commission for compensation as a result of the injury and death of said Roberts. A hearing was duly had, and the commission made its findings and entered its decision denying said application. The matter now comes before us on a writ of review. The plaintiffs “assign as error (1) that the Industrial Commission erred in its Finding that the deceased was not killed as a result of injuries sustained arising out of or in the course of his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kyle v. Greene High SchoolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Messer v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Cymbor v. Binder Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vitagraph, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Ogden Transit Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. FrazeeUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Camacho v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Berriman v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API