Legal Opinion

Berriman v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1936No. 5769Published

1Opinion of the Court

EPHRAIM HANSON, Justice.

In this proceeding we are asked to review the action of the Industrial Commission of Utah in denying the application of J. H. Berriman for an award. From the record it appears that on December 3, 1918, Berriman was in the employ of the Gemini Mining Company, an employer subject to the terms of our Workmen’s Compensation Act (Rev. St. 1933, 42-1-1 et seq.). On that date, while he was drilling, a piece of rock flew and struck his left eye. On January, 8, 1919, he filed an application with the State Insurance Fund for compensation; the State Insurance Fund being the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kent v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Roberts v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API