Worth v. Steam-Boat Lioness No 2.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
Tbeat, D. J.
The demands are by mariners, under shipping contracts. The libellants shipped respectively at Pittsburgh and Louisville, without shipping articles or any express statement as to the proposed voyage. All parties knew that the vessel was engaged in towing claimant’s barges from one point on the Ohio river to another point on the same river, and also to different points on the Mississippi river. The vessel, in the course of her voyaging, encountered ice in the Mississippi river and laid up at Bushburg, about 20 miles below St. Louis. As it was uncertain how long she might be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoyt v. WildfireNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Rossiter v. CooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
- Brooks v. DorrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
- Emerson v. HowlandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1816
- Hunt v. ColburnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1853
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Case of the Chinese Cabin WaiterUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
- Hansen v. Oil Transfer Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949