Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 3, 1986No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 35, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition seeking disciplinary action against R. Edwin Brown, a member of the Maryland Bar since 7 October 1941. We referred the matter to Judge Peter J. Messitte of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. In his exhaustive “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations,” Judge Messitte rejected some of the Commission’s charges, but nevertheless concluded that Brown had violated DR 1-102 (A)(1) (violation of a disciplinary rule), DR 1-102 (A)(6) (engaging in conduct that adversely…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. EdibCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API