Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bohlen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1989No. 8818SC1014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries he allegedly sustained in an automobile accident. Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that his car was struck from behind by a car driven by defendant James Bohlen and owned by defendant Betty Lou Bohlen. The accident occurred as plaintiff was making a right-hand turn into a driveway. Plaintiff offered evidence to show that he suffered a permanent injury to his neck and permanent nerve damage as a result of the collision.

*349Defendants offered no evidence. The jury found that plaintiff was not injured by the negligence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Watson v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BoromIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Gee v. StephensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Fanello v. McLane Foodservice, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API