Legal Opinion

Miceli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1988No. J—119—1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

519 Pa. 515 (1988)

549 A.2d 113

Frank D. MICELI, Charles Minnich and Leander Krist, Token Claimants, Appellants,

v.

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellee, and Quaker Oats Company, Intervenor.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued May 10, 1988.

Decided October 17, 1988.

Ira H. Weinstock, Paul J. Dellasega, Gerard M. Mackarevich, Harrisburg, for appellants.

Clifford Blazes, Acting Dep. Chief Counsel, James K. Bradley, Asst. Counsel, for appellee.

C. Grainger Bowman, Harrisburg, Michael Welch, pro hac vice, for intervenor.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Flaherty; Concurrence · Nix; Concurrence · McDERMOTT; Concurrence · Zappala.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Roberts v. School Dist. of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API