Legal Opinion

Monteleone v. Gestetner Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold Baer, Jr., J.

Fifth-party defendants Union Carbide and Stauffer Chemical Company, and fourth-party defendants Eastman Chemical Products, Inc. and Novick Chemical Company Inc., move collectively in this negligence action for a bifurcated trial and to exclude the infant plaintiff, Gianni Monteleone, from the courtroom during the liability phase of a bifurcated trial. Defendant Gestetner Corporation cross-moves for the same relief.

Gianni Monteleone, a 10-year-old boy, was born without arms or hands and with functional, but substantially shortened legs. At the hearing in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Richardson-Merrell, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  2. Carlisle v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Morley v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Dickson v. BoberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Gage v. BozarthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bremner v. CharlesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Caputo v. Joseph J. Sarcona Trucking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Cary by and Through Cary v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Cary by and Through Cary v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API