Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cary by and Through Cary v. Oneok, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 1, 1997No. 81356, 81655Published

1DissentOp Ala, Justice

¶ 1 Desiring, no doubt, to avoid a result perceived to be harsh, the court today (1) invents a new doctrine that a litigant may never be excluded from the courtroom — solely on the grounds of disfigurement — during any phase of the civil trial, (2) subtly and gratuitously injects the Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA]1 into its analysis and (3) cavalierly remands this cause for a retrial that would allow the plaintiffs disfigured minor to be exhibited before the jury, even though its new standard against exclusion was unknown to the law when the case was tried originally.

¶ 2 Were I writing…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API