Legal Opinion
Foster v. Alexander
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 27, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-2682PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.
This simple but bothersome case comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b), summary judgment shall be granted upon a showing “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” After reviewing the record herein, we agree with defendants that plaintiff has failed to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of the essential elements upon which her claims depend. There is no genuine issue as to any material…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Thomas v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- David Grider and Leon Gladecki v. Lauro Cavazos, Secretary of the United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Janet G. Hurst, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. United States Department of Education, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gilmer Reece v. Henry Cisneros, Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Rendleman v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- United States v. Carolyn Melenyah, A/K/A Carolyn Vaughn, A/K/A Carolyn P. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994