Legal Opinion
City of Bremerton v. Bradshaw
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 27, 2004No. 29780-9-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Morgan, A.C.J.
The question is whether a trial court sentencing a third-time DUI offender under RCW *41246.61.5055(3)(b) must grant credit, against mandatory jail time, for time served on electronic home monitoring prior to trial. The answer is no.
Alice Bradshaw was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUI) in the City of Bremerton. She refused a breath test and was released on electronic home monitoring (EHM) pending trial. By October 18, 2001, she had spent 240 days on EHM.
On October 18, 2001, the Bremerton Municipal Court sentenced Bradshaw. She had two prior DUIs within the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SpeaksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SneddenWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Harris v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Harris v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- City of Bremerton v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004