Hazelwood v. State

Phipps, Judge.

Jimmy Hazelwood appeals his aggravated assault conviction, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Because the evidence was sufficient, we affirm.

In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction, we view the record in the light most favorable to the verdict.

We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility, but only determine whether the evidence was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Conflicts in the testimony of…