Legal Opinion

State v. Mark Lankford

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2017No. Docket 35617PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

Mark Henry Lankford (Lankford) appeals from his judgment of conviction after a jury in Idaho County district court found him guilty of two counts of felony murder. Lank-ford argues that the district court erred in multiple ways and that he is entitled to a new trial. The State argues that Lankford has failed to prove that reversible error was committed by the district court and that Lankford’s convictions should be affirmed.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Lankford and his brother, Bryan Lankford (Bryan), were both convicted and sentenced to death for the 1983 murders of…

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. HerreraIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. GarciaIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. Erik Virgil HallIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. AndersenIdaho Supreme Court · 2018

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API