Legal Opinion
Hertzel v. Weber
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 6, 1926No. 16403PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
The facts necessary to a decision of the case may be summarized as follows: Prior t-o statehood the Vinita & Chelsea Oil Company and Oliver Bagby acquired oil and gas leases, approved by the Secretary of the Interior, on what was known as the Moore & Mode allotments. The lessees entered into a drilling contract with Howard Weber, plaintiff in this case, by which Weber agreed to develop and operate the leases and pay to the lessees a 25 per cent.'royalty, Weber to have the remaining 75 per cent, of the oil and gas for the development. Weber then entered into an agreement with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Scranton City v. Peoples Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Alexander v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- O. S. Stapley Co. v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Dame v. Cochiti Reduction & Improvement Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1905
- Hertzel v. WeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Security Insurance Company Of New Haven v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Security State Bank of Comanche v. W. R. Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Murphy v. O'DonnellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Pierson v. American National Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.