Seastrunk Rendering Co. v. Hollingsworth
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McClendon, chief justice.
The purposes of this suit were: (1) To abate and enjoin continuance of nuisances consisting (a) of a plant for rendering garbage and bodies of dead animals to extract grease therefrom, and (b) of large hog pens in connection therewith; and (2) to enjoin the manner in which the plant and pens were operated. The suit was filed May 31, 1943, and tried July 29-Aug. 1, 1943, to the court. The plant was located about half way between Temple and Belton on U. S. Highway 81, at a rural community called Midway. The materials from which grease was rendered consisted in the main…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fort Worth Acid Works v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Ballentine v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Borden Co. v. Local No. 133 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- City of Fort Worth v. Fort Worth Acid Works Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Royalty v. StrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lynch v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Angelina Hardwood Lumber Company v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Hice v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Lynch v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956