City of Fort Worth v. Fort Worth Acid Works Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
Plaintiff in error! tlie city of Port Worth, on the 18th day of September, 1922, presented to the judge of the district court of the Sixty-Seventh judicial district, then in session, its application and petition alleging that the defendants in error, Port Worth Acid Works Company and Paul Roess-ner, were the owners of a plant within said city being used for the purpose of producing sulphuric acid; that in their use of said plant they were causing great quantities of fumes, gas.es, and vapors to be emitted therefrom which were injurious and obnoxious to the health and comfort of the people…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Riggins v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Fort Worth Acid Works v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hellenic Investment, Inc. v. Kroger Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- Borden Co. v. Local No. 133 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- American Casualty and Life Insurance Co. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Traveler's Insurance Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- City Council of Fort Worth v. Fort Worth Associated Master Plumbers & Heating Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.