Legal Opinion

Hice v. Cole

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1956No. 6052PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

Under date of February 23, 1953, appellant, E. L. Hice, and his wife,” Mable Hice, sold to appellee, Mike Cole, a butane gas business E. L. Hice had been operating in and from Vidor, Texas. As a part of the transaction, E. L. Hice agreed and covenanted that for a period of five yeafs from the date aforesaid he would not "enter into any phase of the liquified petroleum gas business either directly or indirectly, as owner or as an employee, either at wholesale or retail, either in the sale of fuel or of tanks, in any part of Orange County or in the trade territory heretofore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Villalobos v. HolguinTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Love v. State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Fort Worth Acid Works v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rhodia, Inc. v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Northcutt v. WarenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Gomez v. Zamora, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  4. McLean v. Employers Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API