Legal Opinion

Holguin v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 29, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

This is an appeal from judgment in favor of appellee Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna) in an action for breach of contract and bad faith failure to settle. Following a court trial, the court entered findings of facts and conclusions of law holding that the Aetna insurance policy at issue was not in effect at the time of the accident. We agree with the trial court and affirm.

The necessary facts are as follows. In October 1980, Aetna issued an automobile policy to David Kipnis to cover his new Datsun 280ZX. In March 1981, Aetna notified the insured that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sereno v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sims Printing Co. v. KerbyArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. MacRae v. MacRaeArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Tunprasert v. PrinceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Carlisle v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. ToccoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Parker v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. American Construction Corp. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
  4. Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Los Angeles v. DaceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API