American Construction Corp. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge.
Plaintiff American Construction Corp. (“American”) brought this action seeking a declaration to determine whether Defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (“Philadelphia”) has an obli gation to indemnify American under an insurance policy. (Doc. # 1.) American also seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Id. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. (Doc. #40, 43.) Philadelphia also seeks attorneys’ fees in connection with its motion, and it has asked the Court to strike American’s Reply in Support of its Motion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Antonopoulos v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2021