Legal Opinion

American Construction Corp. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 30, 2009No. CV08-2141-PHX-NVWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge.

Plaintiff American Construction Corp. (“American”) brought this action seeking a declaration to determine whether Defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (“Philadelphia”) has an obli gation to indemnify American under an insurance policy. (Doc. # 1.) American also seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Id. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. (Doc. #40, 43.) Philadelphia also seeks attorneys’ fees in connection with its motion, and it has asked the Court to strike American’s Reply in Support of its Motion…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Antonopoulos v. Mid-Century Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API