Legal Opinion

ZISKIND v. Bruce Lee Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1973No. Appeals, 142 and 207PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

We must decide two distinct questions with, regard to the instant appeal: (1) did the trial court properly enter judgment on defendant’s counterclaim for the recovery of a down payment on a land sale contract, and (2) should plaintiff-appellants have been permitted to join as an additional defendant a party to whom a portion of the down payment had been paid in reliance on the validity of the sale agreement?

In October, 1971, appellants, Gerald N. Ziskind and Louis 0. Glasso, Inc., and the appellee, Bruce Lee Corporation (hereinafter, “Lee”), executed a written agreement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schermer v. WilmartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Fisher Et Ux. v. City of Phila.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Evans v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Bozdech v. Montana Ranches Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Fossume v. . RequaNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. LEH v. BURKESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Secretary of the Department of Transportation v. Regency Group, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Rose v. Mitsubishi International Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. In re Sale by Lawrence County Tax Claim Bureau of 10.85 Acres of Land Situate in Wayne TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Brogan v. Rosenn, Jenkins & Greenwald, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API