Legal Opinion

Schermer v. Wilmart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1924No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb,. Justice Simpson,

Defendant appeals from a decree ©f the court below, awarding specific performance of the contract detailed in the following receipt:

“February 9th, 1923
“Received from D. Schermer the sum of $40. on a/c of the purchase price of property 3711 Powelton Av. the full consideration of selling price of the above property is $8750., a further deposit of $210. to be paid on the 12th day of February 1923. Possession of the property to be given on or before June 8th, 1923, at which time final settlement is to be made.
“A regular agreement of sale for the selling of the above…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Moore v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Theobald v. SylvesterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Briggs v. Logan Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Sylvester v. BornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Taylor v. Stanley Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Emerman v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Onyx Oils & Resins, Inc. v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API