Legal Opinion

State v. Cunningham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1888No. 14,360PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

On the 12th day of January, 1885, the Household Sewing Machine Company recovered a judgment in the St. Joseph Circuit Court against Andrew Cunningham, the appellee herein, for the sum of $198 and costs of suit. Cunningham was at the time, and has since continued to be, a resident of St. Joseph county. An execution was-thereafter issued on such judgment and delivered to the sheriff of said county of St. Joseph, who, on the 13th day of July, 1885, returned the same wholly unsatisfied. After-wards the sewing machine company filed its petition in the office of the clerk of the St. Joseph Circuit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cushman v. GephartIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Dillman v. DillmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Fowler v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Wallace v. LawyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Maddox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API