Legal Opinion
Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1955PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
Defendants Wright Aeronautical Corporation and its successor, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (herein called Curtiss-Wright) move jjbn the complaint, their answer and plaintiff’s bill of particulars^for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the third cause of action on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.
*478In the first two causes of action — not here involved ■ — • plaintiff Trans World Airlines, Inc. (herein called TWA) seeks damages of $3,000,000 as the result of a crash of one of its airplanes near Cairo, Egypt, in August, 1950. These two causes are against Lockheed Aircraft…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.