Legal Opinion

Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1981No. 16872Published

1Opinion of the Court

631 P.2d 899 (1981)

BANBERRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, McKean Construction Company, Midwest Realty and Finance, Inc., a Utah corporation, Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

SOUTH JORDAN CITY, a municipal corporation, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 16872.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 3, 1981.

Michael J. Mazuran, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

John H. McDonald, Craig S. Cook, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and respondents.

OAKS, Justice:

This is a suit by three subdividers against a city to challenge the validity of water connection and park improvement fees imposed as a condition to connection to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Airwick Industries, Inc. v. Carlstadt Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Deerfield Estates, Inc. v. Township of East BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. Call v. City of West JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. West Park Ave., Inc. v. Township of OceanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API