Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Fort

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1935PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

These canses were heard together. They present the same questions. Both suits were brought to recover gasoline taxes paid under protest. The chancellor dismissed both hills on demurrer. Both complainants appealed.

By chapter 130, Acts 1933, the Legislature amended various sections of the Code of 1932, beginning with section 1126, so as to provide that the gasoline tax of six cents per gallon (see Pub. Acts 1931, chap. 40) should be paid by dealers and distributors according to the amount held in storage in this state, instead of according to the number of gallons withdrawn from storage, as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. YardleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hunter v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Foster & Creighton Co. v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. State v. RunnelsTennessee Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Pharr v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. HammerTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Basham v. Southeastern Motor Truck Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API